I think it's the Rubio campaign.

You got just a few things wrong there "Ariel". Number one - the call does not say it is someone "taking a poll for the Republican party" it says it has some questions about the Republican candidates running for president. Number two - it doesn't tell you that UNLESS you press #1 to confirm who you are - so you did press 1 or you wouldn't have heard it.  Number three - it was paid for by the Democrats, not the Republicans and number four - it doesn't cost them anything for a long distance call, since anyone who has a landline phone and who has maintained their service knows that all current phone line plans include unlimited long distance. Only old plans still have long distance charges, and the newer plans that were changed around 4-5 years ago to combat everyone dropping their home phone service for cell service which also has unlimited long distance at no additional charges actually cost less than the old plans that did not include long distance. Even Centurylink home plans include unlimited long distance for almost half the cost of their old plans that did not include it. So, I guess that means that  you will never be voting Democrat again - since at least according to your view on receiving political survey calls - they are the ones that are "intrusive and annoying". So glad that I could clear that up for you.  I had to laugh at the second question about how conservative are you, press #1 for "moderate or not conservative at all". Only in the mind of a liberal could they come up with that twisted idea of a conservative voter.

These calls are scripts to determine if your number is active. If you pick up they sell your number.

How right you are Dave and this one is no different. It is being done by the Democrats to get information on who conservatives would vote for under various conditions. Even if you don't listen all the way to the end of the "survey" the second question gave them away. They wanted to know how conservative you are and their  first option was "Moderate, or, Not conservative at all". I also agree with your question about not voting for an entire party because of one issue - the only thing worse in my mind is someone who would vote  for every candidate strictly along political party lines. I could never understand growing up in Chicago why there was an option for voting for the political party instead of the individual candidates. You would push one lever and it would move all of the little lever switches for everyone of that party. I could not then and still can not now conceive that anyone would give up their own individualism to a political party over their own sense of judgement. Surely there is no one who can honestly say that they agree with every one of a single party's candidates and not even one of the other party's. By doing so they have given up their own right to vote and instead handed it over to whoever is in charge of the party, in this case Debbie Wasserman Schultz. And that should not only disqualify them from being able to vote in future elections but should also prevent them from ever being able to purchase a firearm, since they obviously can not make sensible decisions on their own...

Robo called four times.  Asked specifically for "Beth".  Political survey.
Scum of the Earth organization that is being funded by who knows?
Called the number back this morning and pressed "1" to be removed.
Lets see if they abide.  Most unfortunate that people and organizations
hide their true identity with robo or live calls in an attempt to get information,
money, or me vote.