+1 607-203-5669
We have got 26 reports against 6072035669
The majority indicated that it is a Other
Who called 6072035669
Location: New York
Operator: Билайн
Views: 18
Detailed information
Best report
ϟ
Jan 9, 2014
same
Other
Recent comments:
11
Jan 21, 2014
Just called me during school. Didn't answer, and they didn't leave a message.
Other
12
Jan 22, 2014
SAME ALOT OF SPAM CALLS STARTING A MONTH AGO
Other
13
Jan 22, 2014
no message called back  automatic attendent anoying

Also same for 412-430-5663
Telemarketer
14
Jan 23, 2014
more calls, no messages... just keeping these forums updated!
This appears to be linked to "Feature Films," which is using several different numbers to harass random people... Have received a lot of these!
Telemarketer
15
Jan 24, 2014
Yeah. I've received LOTS of calls from the various Feature Films for Families numbers.  This one, 412-430-5663, 607-203-5669, 866-840-4246 (maybe - it's one of many numbers that keep calling), 678-310-2858, 651-333-4104- 618-221-0188, 951-266-5572, 657-202-9080, 215-383-3472... yeah, they're from all over the country.

Here's Wikipedia's take on it:
Feature Films for Families (FFFF) is a privately owned company that sends out videos that its website, named Family TV, calls "family movies with family values".[1] The company, its owner, and related companies have been the subject of several government and phone company lawsuits concerning deceptive practices and illegal telemarketing, including calling people again who had told the companies to stop calling, and targeting "parents and grandparents" with false "fundraiser" claims after the victims received DVDs and a survey.

In 2009, Feature Films for Families and the Dove Foundation together paid $70,000 to Missouri's Merchandising Practices Revolving Fund after using the Dove Foundation to solicit on behalf of the for-profit Feature Films for Families to attempt to evade the Missouri No Call law. Feature Films for Families had created an alliance with the Dove Foundation, a non-profit foundation which is known for its activities of rating, reviewing, and endorsing films. The two companies worked together via telemarketing, but because Feature Films for Families is a for-profit corporation, this allegiance violated Missouri's No Call law.[6]

In 2010, Verizon Wireless filed suit against Feature Films for Families after the company allegedly placed nearly 500,000 illegal automated telemarketing calls in ten days to the mobile phones on Verizon's network. The calls were recorded advertisements for the FFFF film The Velveteen Rabbit.[7]

In a related suit in May 2011, the Justice Department, acting for the Federal Trade Commission, filed a complaint[8] in U.S. District Court in Florida charging Feature Films for Families, Inc., its owner Forrest S. Baker III, and two other companies owned by Baker — named "Corporations for Character, L.C." and "Family Films of Utah" — with "waging deceptive and illegal telemarketing campaigns pitching movies and soliciting for donations, including calls to more than 16 million phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry."[2] The complaint seeks "a court order to permanently bar the defendants from violating the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule, as well as civil penalties, and disgorgement of their ill-gotten gains."[2] Among the behavior described by the complaint:

Calling over 2 million Do Not Call Registry numbers in a space of only two weeks.
Calling people again who had already told the companies not to call them.
Using fake Caller ID names like "CUSTOMER SVC", "FAMILY VALUES CB", and "VELVETEEN", and failing to orally identify the seller, the purpose of the call, and the nature of what was being advertised.
Claiming that "all of the proceeds of this fundraiser will help us finish up creating this recommended viewing list to help parents and grandparents, like us, with a list we can trust" when the organization responsible for the list was not receiving all of the money, and the for-profit companies kept at least 93% of the proceeds.
Doing additional telemarketing on behalf of organizations whose names were related to police and firefighters, and claiming that the administrative costs were a "very minimal amount", then keeping most of the donations for the telemarketers themselves.[2]

And they keep calling???
Telemarketer
Report